


\documentclass{chapman}

%%% copy Sweave.sty definitions

%%% keeps `sweave' from adding `\usepackage{Sweave}': DO NOT REMOVE
%\usepackage{Sweave} 


\RequirePackage[T1]{fontenc}
\RequirePackage{graphicx,ae,fancyvrb}
\IfFileExists{upquote.sty}{\RequirePackage{upquote}}{}
\usepackage{relsize}

\DefineVerbatimEnvironment{Sinput}{Verbatim}{}
\DefineVerbatimEnvironment{Soutput}{Verbatim}{fontfamily=courier,
                                              fontshape=it,
                                              fontsize=\relsize{-1}}
\DefineVerbatimEnvironment{Scode}{Verbatim}{}
\newenvironment{Schunk}{}{}

%%% environment for raw output
\newcommand{\SchunkRaw}{\renewenvironment{Schunk}{}{}
    \DefineVerbatimEnvironment{Soutput}{Verbatim}{fontfamily=courier,
                                                  fontshape=it,
                                                  fontsize=\small}
    \rawSinput
}

%%% environment for labeled output
\newcommand{\nextcaption}{}
\newcommand{\SchunkLabel}{
  \renewenvironment{Schunk}{\begin{figure}[ht] }{\caption{\nextcaption}
  \end{figure} }
  \DefineVerbatimEnvironment{Sinput}{Verbatim}{frame = topline}
  \DefineVerbatimEnvironment{Soutput}{Verbatim}{frame = bottomline, 
                                                samepage = true,
                                                fontfamily=courier,
                                                fontshape=it,
                                                fontsize=\relsize{-1}}
}


%%% S code with line numbers
\DefineVerbatimEnvironment{Sinput}
{Verbatim}
{
%%  numbers=left
}

\newcommand{\numberSinput}{
    \DefineVerbatimEnvironment{Sinput}{Verbatim}{numbers=left}
}
\newcommand{\rawSinput}{
    \DefineVerbatimEnvironment{Sinput}{Verbatim}{}
}


%%% R / System symbols
\newcommand{\R}{\textsf{R}}
\newcommand{\rR}{{R}}
\renewcommand{\S}{\textsf{S}}
\newcommand{\SPLUS}{\textsf{S-PLUS}}
\newcommand{\rSPLUS}{{S-PLUS}}
\newcommand{\SPSS}{\textsf{SPSS}}
\newcommand{\EXCEL}{\textsf{Excel}}
\newcommand{\ACCESS}{\textsf{Access}}
\newcommand{\SQL}{\textsf{SQL}}
%%\newcommand{\Rpackage}[1]{\hbox{\rm\textit{#1}}}
%%\newcommand{\Robject}[1]{\hbox{\rm\texttt{#1}}}
%%\newcommand{\Rclass}[1]{\hbox{\rm\textit{#1}}}
%%\newcommand{\Rcmd}[1]{\hbox{\rm\texttt{#1}}}
\newcommand{\Rpackage}[1]{\index{#1 package@{\fontseries{b}\selectfont #1} package} {\fontseries{b}\selectfont #1}}
\newcommand{\rpackage}[1]{{\fontseries{b}\selectfont #1}}
\newcommand{\Robject}[1]{\texttt{#1}}
\newcommand{\Rclass}[1]{\index{#1 class@\textit{#1} class}\textit{#1}}
\newcommand{\Rcmd}[1]{\index{#1 function@\texttt{#1} function}\texttt{#1}}
\newcommand{\Roperator}[1]{\texttt{#1}}
\newcommand{\Rarg}[1]{\texttt{#1}}
\newcommand{\Rlevel}[1]{\texttt{#1}}


%%% other symbols
\newcommand{\file}[1]{\hbox{\rm\texttt{#1}}}
%%\newcommand{\stress}[1]{\index{#1}\textit{#1}} 
\newcommand{\stress}[1]{\textit{#1}} 
\newcommand{\booktitle}[1]{\textit{#1}} %%'

%%% Math symbols
\usepackage{amstext}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\newcommand{\E}{\mathsf{E}}   
\newcommand{\Var}{\mathsf{Var}}   
\newcommand{\Cov}{\mathsf{Cov}}   
\newcommand{\Cor}{\mathsf{Cor}}   
\newcommand{\x}{\mathbf{x}}   
\newcommand{\y}{\mathbf{y}}   
\renewcommand{\a}{\mathbf{a}}
\newcommand{\W}{\mathbf{W}}   
\newcommand{\C}{\mathbf{C}}   
\renewcommand{\H}{\mathbf{H}}   
\newcommand{\X}{\mathbf{X}}   
\newcommand{\B}{\mathbf{B}}   
\newcommand{\V}{\mathbf{V}}   
\newcommand{\I}{\mathbf{I}}   
\newcommand{\D}{\mathbf{D}}   
\newcommand{\bS}{\mathbf{S}}   
\newcommand{\N}{\mathcal{N}}   
\renewcommand{\P}{\mathsf{P}}   
\newcommand{\K}{\mathbf{K}}
\newcommand{\m}{\mathbf{m}}
\newcommand{\argmin}{\operatorname{argmin}\displaylimits}
\newcommand{\argmax}{\operatorname{argmax}\displaylimits}
%%% links
\usepackage{hyperref}

\hypersetup{%
  pdftitle = {A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using R},
  pdfsubject = {Book},
  pdfauthor = {Brian S. Everitt and Torsten Hothorn},
  colorlinks = {black},
  linkcolor = {black},
  citecolor = {black},
  urlcolor = {black},
  hyperindex = {true},
  linktocpage = {true},
}


%%% captions & tables
%% <FIXME>: conflics with figure definition in chapman.cls
%%\usepackage[format=hang,margin=10pt,labelfont=bf]{caption}
%% </FIMXE>
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}

%%% R symbol in chapter 1
\usepackage{wrapfig}

%%% Bibliography
\usepackage[round,comma]{natbib}
\renewcommand{\refname}{References \addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{References}}
\citeindexfalse

%%% texi2dvi complains that \newblock is undefined, hm...
\def\newblock{\hskip .11em plus .33em minus .07em}

%%% Example sections
\newcounter{exercise}[chapter]
\setcounter{exercise}{0}
\newcommand{\exercise}{\item{\stepcounter{exercise} Ex.
                       \arabic{chapter}.\arabic{exercise} }}


%% URLs
\newcommand{\curl}[1]{\begin{center} \url{#1} \end{center}}

%%% for manual corrections
%\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{2}

%%% plot sizes
\setkeys{Gin}{width=0.95\textwidth}

%%% color
\usepackage{color}

%%% hyphenations
\hyphenation{drop-out}
\hyphenation{mar-gi-nal}

%%% new bidirectional quotes need 
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\begin{document}

%% Title page

\title{A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using \R{} --- 2nd Edition}

\author{Brian S. Everitt and Torsten Hothorn}

\maketitle
%%\VignetteIndexEntry{Chapter Simultaneous Inference and Multiple Comparisons}
%%\VignetteDepends{lme4}
\setcounter{chapter}{13}


\SweaveOpts{prefix.string=figures/HSAUR,eps=FALSE,keep.source=TRUE} 

<<setup, echo = FALSE, results = hide>>=
rm(list = ls())
s <- search()[-1]
s <- s[-match(c("package:base", "package:stats", "package:graphics", "package:grDevices",
                "package:utils", "package:datasets", "package:methods", "Autoloads"), s)]
if (length(s) > 0) sapply(s, detach, character.only = TRUE)
if (!file.exists("tables")) dir.create("tables")
if (!file.exists("figures")) dir.create("figures")
set.seed(290875)
options(prompt = "R> ", continue = "+  ",
    width = 63, # digits = 4, 
    show.signif.stars = FALSE,
    SweaveHooks = list(leftpar = function() 
        par(mai = par("mai") * c(1, 1.05, 1, 1)),
        bigleftpar = function()
        par(mai = par("mai") * c(1, 1.7, 1, 1))))
HSAURpkg <- require("HSAUR2")
if (!HSAURpkg) stop("cannot load package ", sQuote("HSAUR2"))
rm(HSAURpkg)
 ### </FIXME> hm, R-2.4.0 --vanilla seems to need this
a <- Sys.setlocale("LC_ALL", "C")
 ### </FIXME>
book <- TRUE
refs <- cbind(c("AItR", "DAGD", "SI", "CI", "ANOVA", "MLR", "GLM", 
                "DE", "RP", "GAM", "SA", "ALDI", "ALDII", "SIMC", "MA", "PCA", 
                "MDS", "CA"), 1:18)
ch <- function(x) {
    ch <- refs[which(refs[,1] == x),]
    if (book) {
        return(paste("Chapter~\\\\ref{", ch[1], "}", sep = ""))
    } else {
        return(paste("Chapter~", ch[2], sep = ""))
    }
}
if (file.exists("deparse.R"))
    source("deparse.R")

setHook(packageEvent("lattice", "attach"), function(...) {
    lattice.options(default.theme = 
        function()
            standard.theme("pdf", color = FALSE))
    })
@

\pagestyle{headings}
<<singlebook, echo = FALSE>>=
book <- FALSE
@

<<SIMC-setup, echo = FALSE, results = hide>>=
library("multcomp")
library("coin")
library("sandwich")
library("lme4")
@

\chapter[Simultaneous Inference and Multiple Comparisons]{Simultaneous Inference 
    and Multiple Comparisons: Genetic Components of Alcoholism, 
    Deer Browsing Intensities, and Cloud Seeding \label{SIMC}}

\section{Introduction}


\section{Simultaneous Inference and Multiple Comparisons}


\section{Analysis Using \R{}}

\subsection{Genetic Components of Alcoholism}

We start with a graphical display of the data. Three parallel boxplots
shown in Figure~\ref{SIMC-alpha-data-figure} indicate increasing
expression levels of alpha synuclein mRNA for longer \textit{NACP}-REP1 alleles.

%%\setkeys{Gin}{width=0.6\textwidth}
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
<<SIMC-alpha-data-figure, echo = TRUE, fig = TRUE, width = 7, height = 5>>=
n <- table(alpha$alength)
levels(alpha$alength) <- abbreviate(levels(alpha$alength), 4)
plot(elevel ~ alength, data = alpha, varwidth = TRUE,
     ylab = "Expression Level", 
     xlab = "NACP-REP1 Allele Length")
axis(3, at = 1:3, labels = paste("n = ", n))
@
\caption{Distribution of levels of expressed alpha synuclein mRNA
         in three groups defined by the \textit{NACP}-REP1 allele lengths.
         \label{SIMC-alpha-data-figure}}
\end{center}
\end{figure}

\index{Tukey honest significant differences|(}
In order to model this relationship, we start fitting a simple one-way ANOVA 
model of the form
$y_{ij} = \mu + \gamma_i + \varepsilon_{ij}$
to the data with independent normal errors $\varepsilon_{ij} \sim \N(0, \sigma^2)$, 
$j \in \{\text{short}, \text{intermediate}, \text{long}\}$, and  
$i = 1, \dots, n_j$. The parameters
$\mu + \gamma_\text{short}$, $\mu + \gamma_\text{intermediate}$ and $\mu + \gamma_\text{long}$
can be interpreted as the mean expression levels in the corresponding groups.
As already discussed in \Sexpr{ch("ANOVA")}, this
model description is overparameterised. A standard approach is to consider a 
suitable re-parameterization. The so-called ``treatment contrast'' vector $%
\theta = (\mu, \gamma_\text{intermediate} - \gamma_\text{short}, \gamma_\text{long} - 
\gamma_\text{short})$ (the default re-parameterization used as  
elemental parameters in \R{}) is one possibility and is equivalent to imposing the restriction 
$\gamma_\text{short} = 0$.

In addition, we define all comparisons among our three groups by
choosing $\K$ such that $\K \theta$ contains all three 
group differences (Tukey's all-pairwise comparisons): %%'
\begin{eqnarray*}
\K_\text{Tukey} = \left(
\begin{array}{rrr}
0 & 1 & 0 \\%% 
0 & 0 & 1 \\%% 
0 & -1 & 1%  
\end{array}  
\right)
\end{eqnarray*}
with parameters of interest
\begin{eqnarray*}
\vartheta_\text{Tukey} = \K_\text{Tukey} \theta = 
(\gamma_\text{intermediate} - \gamma_\text{short}, \gamma_\text{long} - \gamma_\text{short},
\gamma_\text{long} - \gamma_\text{intermediate}).
\end{eqnarray*}

The function \Rcmd{glht} (for generalised linear hypothesis) from package \Rpackage{multcomp} 
\citep{PKG:multcomp,HSAUR:HothornBretzWestfall2008}
takes the fitted \Rclass{aov} object and a description of the matrix 
$\K$. Here, we use the \Rcmd{mcp} function to set up the matrix 
of all pairwise differences for the model parameters associated
with factor \Robject{alength}:
<<SIMC-alpha-aov-tukey, echo = TRUE>>=
library("multcomp")
amod <- aov(elevel ~ alength, data = alpha)
amod_glht <- glht(amod, linfct = mcp(alength = "Tukey"))
@
The matrix $\K$ reads
<<SIMC-alpha-aov-tukey-K, echo = TRUE>>=
amod_glht$linfct
@
The \Robject{amod\_glht} object now contains information
about the estimated linear function $\hat{\vartheta}$ and 
their covariance matrix which can be inspected
via the \Rcmd{coef} and \Rcmd{vcov} methods:
<<SIMC-alpha-aov-coefvcov, echo = TRUE>>=
coef(amod_glht)
vcov(amod_glht)
@
The \Rcmd{summary}
and \Rcmd{confint} methods can be used to compute a
summary statistic including adjusted $p$-values and 
simultaneous confidence intervals, respectively:
<<SIMC-alpha-aov-results, echo = TRUE>>=
confint(amod_glht)
summary(amod_glht)
@

Because of the variance heterogeneity 
that can be observed in Figure~\ref{SIMC-alpha-data-figure}, one might be concerned 
with the validity of the above results stating that there
is no difference between any combination of the three
allele lengths. A sandwich estimator
might be more appropriate in this situation, and
the \Rarg{vcov} argument can be used
to specify a function to compute some alternative 
covariance estimator as follows:
<<SIMC-aov-tukey-sandwich, echo = TRUE>>=
amod_glht_sw <- glht(amod, linfct = mcp(alength = "Tukey"), 
                     vcov = sandwich)
summary(amod_glht_sw)
@
We use the \Rcmd{sandwich} function from package \Rpackage{sandwich}
\citep{PKG:sandwich, HSAUR:Zeileis2006} which provides us with a 
heteroscedasticity-consistent estimator of the covariance matrix.
This result is more in line with previously published findings
for this study
obtained from non-parametric test procedures such as the
Kruskal-Wallis test. A comparison of the simultaneous 
confidence intervals calculated based on the ordinary and
sandwich estimator is given in Figure~\ref{SIMC-alpha-confint-plot}.

%%\setkeys{Gin}{width=0.95\textwidth}
\begin{figure}[h]
\begin{center}
<<SIMC-alpha-confint-plot, echo = TRUE, fig = TRUE, width = 8, height = 3.5>>=
par(mai = par("mai") * c(1, 2.1, 1, 0.5))
layout(matrix(1:2, ncol = 2))
ci1 <- confint(glht(amod, linfct = mcp(alength = "Tukey")))
ci2 <- confint(glht(amod, linfct = mcp(alength = "Tukey"), 
               vcov = sandwich))
ox <- expression(paste("Tukey (ordinary ", bold(S)[n], ")"))
sx <- expression(paste("Tukey (sandwich ", bold(S)[n], ")"))
plot(ci1, xlim = c(-0.6, 2.6), main = ox, 
    xlab = "Difference", ylim = c(0.5, 3.5))
plot(ci2, xlim = c(-0.6, 2.6), main = sx, 
    xlab = "Difference", ylim = c(0.5, 3.5))
@
\caption{Simultaneous confidence intervals for the \Robject{alpha} data based
    on the ordinary covariance matrix (left) and a sandwich estimator (right). 
    \label{SIMC-alpha-confint-plot}}
\end{center}
\end{figure}

It should be noted that this data set is heavily unbalanced;
see Figure~\ref{SIMC-alpha-data-figure}, and therefore the results
obtained from function \Rcmd{TukeyHSD} might be less accurate.
\index{Tukey honest significant differences|)}

\subsection{Deer Browsing}

\index{Generalised linear mixed model|(}
Since we have to take the spatial structure of the deer browsing data into account, we
cannot simply use a logistic regression model as introduced in \Sexpr{ch("GLM")}.
One possibility is to apply a mixed logistic regression model 
\citep[using package \Rpackage{lme4},][]{PKG:lme4}
with random intercept accounting for the spatial variation
of the trees. These models have already been discussed in \Sexpr{ch("ALDII")}.
For each plot nested within a set of five plots
oriented on a 100m transect (the location of the transect  
is determined by a predefined equally spaced lattice of the area under test),
a random intercept is included in the model. Essentially,
trees that are close to each other are handled like repeated
measurements in a longitudinal analysis. We are interested
in probability estimates and confidence intervals for each tree species.
Each of the five fixed parameters of the model corresponds to one species 
(in absence of a global intercept term);
therefore, $\K = \text{diag}(5)$ is the linear function we are interested
in:
<<SIMC-trees-setup, echo = FALSE, results = hide>>=
trees513 <- subset(trees513, !species %in% c("fir", "ash/maple/elm/lime", "softwood (other)"))
trees513$species <- trees513$species[,drop = TRUE]
levels(trees513$species)[nlevels(trees513$species)] <- "hardwood"
@
 
<<SIMC-trees-lmer, echo = TRUE>>=
mmod <- glmer(damage ~ species - 1 + (1 | lattice / plot),
              data = trees513, family = binomial())
K <- diag(length(fixef(mmod)))
K
@
In order to help interpretation, the names of the tree species
and the corresponding sample sizes (computed via \Rcmd{table}) 
are added to $\K$ as row names; this
information will carry through all subsequent steps of our analysis:
<<SIMC-trees-K, echo = TRUE>>=
colnames(K) <- rownames(K) <- 
    paste(gsub("species", "", names(fixef(mmod))),
          " (", table(trees513$species), ")", sep = "")
K
@
Based on $\K$, we first compute simultaneous confidence intervals
for $\K \theta$ and transform these into probabilities.
Note that $\left(1 + \exp(- \hat{\vartheta})\right)^{-1}$ (cf.~Equation~\ref{GLM:logitexp})
is the vector of estimated probabilities;
simultaneous confidence intervals can be transformed to the probability
scale in the same way:
<<SIMC-trees-ci, echo = TRUE>>=
ci <- confint(glht(mmod, linfct = K))
ci$confint <- 1 - binomial()$linkinv(ci$confint)
ci$confint[,2:3] <- ci$confint[,3:2]
@
The result is shown in Figure~\ref{SIMC-trees-plot}. Browsing
is more frequent in hardwood but especially small oak trees are severely
at risk.  Consequently, the local authorities increased the number of roe deers
to be harvested in the following years.
%%The large confidence interval for ash, maple, elm and lime
%%trees is caused by the small sample size.

%%\setkeys{Gin}{width=0.8\textwidth}
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}   
<<SIMC-trees-plot, echo = TRUE, bigleftpar = TRUE, fig = TRUE, width = 7, height = 4.5>>=
plot(ci, xlab = "Probability of Damage Caused by Browsing", 
     xlim = c(0, 0.5), main = "", ylim = c(0.5, 5.5))
@
\caption{Probability of damage caused by roe deer browsing
   for five tree species. Sample sizes are given in brackets. \label{SIMC-trees-plot}}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\index{Generalised linear mixed model|)}

\subsection{Cloud Seeding}

\index{Confidence band|(}
In \Sexpr{ch("MLR")} we studied the dependency of 
rainfall on S-Ne values by means of linear models. Because the number of observations 
is small, an additional assessment of the variability of the fitted regression
lines is interesting. Here, we are interested in a confidence band around
some estimated regression line, i.e., a confidence region which covers the
true but unknown regression line with probability greater or equal 
$1 - \alpha$. It is straightforward to compute \stress{pointwise} 
confidence intervals but we have to make sure that the type I error
is controlled for all $x$ values simultaneously. Consider the simple
linear regression model
\begin{eqnarray*}
\text{rainfall}_i = \beta_0 + \beta_1 \text{sne}_i + \varepsilon_i
\end{eqnarray*}
where we are interested in a confidence band for the predicted rainfall, i.e.,
the values $\hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1 \text{sne}_i$ for some observations 
$\text{sne}_i$. (Note that the estimates $\hat{\beta}_0$ and $\hat{\beta}_1$
are random variables.)

We can formulate the problem as a linear combination of the
regression coefficients by multiplying a matrix $\K$ to a grid of S-Ne values 
(ranging from $1.5$ to $4.5$, say) from the left to the elemental 
parameters $\theta = (\beta_0, \beta_1)$:
\begin{eqnarray*}
\K \theta = \left(
\begin{array}{rr}
1 & 1.50  \\%% 
1 & 1.75  \\%%    
\vdots & \vdots \\%%
1 & 4.25 \\%%
1 & 4.50 %
\end{array}  
\right)\theta = (\beta_0 + \beta_1 1.50, \beta_0 + \beta_1 1.75, \dots, \beta_0 + \beta_1 4.50) = \vartheta.
\end{eqnarray*}
Simultaneous confidence intervals for all the parameters of interest $\vartheta$ form
a confidence band for the estimated regression line. We implement this idea
for the \Robject{clouds} data writing a small reusable function as follows:
<<SIMC-clouds-confband, echo = TRUE>>=
confband <- function(subset, main) {
    mod <- lm(rainfall ~ sne, data = clouds, subset = subset)
    sne_grid <- seq(from = 1.5, to = 4.5, by = 0.25)
    K <- cbind(1, sne_grid)
    sne_ci <- confint(glht(mod, linfct = K))
    plot(rainfall ~ sne, data = clouds, subset = subset,
         xlab = "S-Ne criterion", main = main, 
         xlim = range(clouds$sne), 
         ylim = range(clouds$rainfall))
    abline(mod)
    lines(sne_grid, sne_ci$confint[,2], lty = 2)
    lines(sne_grid, sne_ci$confint[,3], lty = 2)
}
@
The function \Rcmd{confband} basically fits a linear model using \Rcmd{lm}
to a subset of the data, sets up the matrix $\K$ as shown above and nicely
plots both the regression line and the confidence band. Now, this
function can be reused to produce plots similar to Figure~\ref{MLR-clouds-lmplot}
separately for days with and without cloud seeding in Figure~\ref{SIMC-clouds-lmplot}.
For the days without seeding, there is more uncertainty about the true regression
line compared to the days with cloud seeding. Clearly, this is caused by the larger
variability of the observations in the left part of the figure.

\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
<<SIMC-clouds-lmplot, echo = TRUE, fig = TRUE, height = 4>>=
layout(matrix(1:2, ncol = 2))
confband(clouds$seeding == "no", main = "No seeding")
confband(clouds$seeding == "yes", main = "Seeding")
@
\caption{Regression relationship between S-Ne criterion and rainfall with
and without seeding. The confidence bands cover the area within the dashed curves. 
\label{SIMC-clouds-lmplot}}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\index{Confidence band|)}

\section{Summary}

Multiple comparisons in linear models have been in use for a long time. The
\Rpackage{multcomp} package extends much of the theory to a broad class of parametric and
semi-parametric statistical models, which allows for a unified treatment of
multiple comparisons and other simultaneous inference procedures in
generalised linear models, mixed models, models for censored data,
robust models, etc. Honest decisions based on simultaneous inference
procedures maintaining a pre-specified familywise error rate (at least
asymptotically) can be derived from almost all classical and modern 
statistical models. The technical details and more examples can be found
in \cite{HSAUR:HothornBretzWestfall2008} and the package vignettes of 
package \Rpackage{multcomp} \citep{PKG:multcomp}.

\section*{Exercises}

\begin{description}

\exercise 
Compare the results of \Rcmd{glht} and \Rcmd{TukeyHSD} on the \Robject{alpha}
data.

\exercise
Consider the linear model fitted to the clouds data as summarised 
in Figure~\ref{MLR-clouds-summary}. Set up a matrix $\K$ corresponding
to the global null hypothesis that all interaction terms present in the model
are zero. Test both the global hypothesis and all hypotheses corresponding
to each of the interaction terms. Which interaction remains significant
after adjustment for multiple testing?

\exercise
For the logistic regression model presented in Figure~\ref{GLM-womensrole-summary-2}
perform a multiplicity adjusted test on all regression coefficients (except for the intercept)
being zero. Do the conclusions drawn in \Sexpr{ch("GLM")} remain valid?

\end{description}

\bibliographystyle{LaTeXBibTeX/refstyle}
\bibliography{LaTeXBibTeX/HSAUR}
\end{document}
